Dan Carlin's Hardcore History
Subscribed: 365,406Played: 3,414,314
Subscribe
© dancarlin.com
Description
In "Hardcore History" journalist and broadcaster Dan Carlin takes his "Martian", unorthodox way of thinking and applies it to the past. Was Alexander the Great as bad a person as Adolf Hitler? What would Apaches with modern weapons be like? Will our modern civilization ever fall like civilizations from past eras? This isn't academic history (and Carlin isn't a historian) but the podcast's unique blend of high drama, masterful narration and Twilight Zone-style twists has entertained millions of listeners.
Episodes
Reverse
J Gihm
I can't believe I only recently discovered this podcast. I wish I could listen to older shows.
Pedram Ghahremani
your sobjective view on this historical events is amazing. thank you. i learned a lot.
Richard Voit
Wow! we are all very lucky it's #DanCarlinHH telling it and not you idiots.
Bryan Graham
dan Carlin is the goat
JOHNNYxx REB
I have become death, the destroyer of worlds
Daniel DeTorrice
Dan is the 🐐
mark skeehan
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyuyyyy you yuy
Zach Hauge
it's amazing how much better this podcast is than any other history podcast...maybe the history of Rome is up there...great job keep it up
Alan Cruz
what of the LGBT community suffering under Putin? is there a cap you're willing to accept or are all acts of inhumanity, without regards to whom it's aimed at, are those worthy of contempt and condemnation or only those which we, now in this time, are only those fitting of our collective scorn.
Erik Kane
Jesus FUCKING christ Dan...I love the show buddy, but I'm 3.5 hours into the last FIVE HOUR segment and still only a passing mention to the atomic bombs.... get to it!!!
David Haugen
thanks, Dan. great as always!
Tammy Ruslan-Han
boring seem kinda like Dan has a agenda .. boringggg
Paul Lacapruccia
Finally finished. Great work here, Dan. this episode was as good as the episodes from blueprint for Armageddon, which are my favorite in your collection. I have one disagreement, however. Ed King doesn't look like a hero at all, in any way. He was a coward who condemned his men to the Bataan Death March. I find it very generous the only consequence he suffered from the United States was to have his family name thrown in the trash heap where it belongs.
Paul Lacapruccia
Dan, wonderful stuff so far. About 2 hours and 50 minutes in I have to say you're equivocating for cowardice in the surrender of the Singapore and the actions of Australian troops who cowered down in fear on the battlefield amidst hand to hand combat. it was cowardice then and it's still cowardice today. Stalingrad. How the war might have been different if the Russians had the same spine as the Imperial British forces.
Christian Menard
Mad chills!! what a crazy/amazing period in History
Teddy California
FINALLY
Paul Lacapruccia
Dan, I am enjoying this episode quite a bit. I want to comment upon a theory proffered by a historian you quote at about 1 hour and 35 minutes into the podcast. He claims the hundreds of years taken to develop the concept of honorable surrender had a lot to do with westerners inability to obey suicidal orders. I think that concept is of marginal value. I think the very recent experience of World War I and its assembly line style of death was by far and away the most important factor.
Dave Powell
Just finished your book, I enjoyed it. But... it feels like a less fleshed out version of things you've already covered in HCH. For someone who isn't a longtime fan, it will be very informative and interesting. For the rest of us it was sort of a retread of topics you've covered in much more detail in other places.
Aaron Webb
why do the episodes start at 50?
Ikenna Okonkwo (FailedRift)
Really enjoyed the detail in this one. Was thinking this was the last episode. Clearly isn't. I hope the remaining episodes are more regular.