DiscoverThe Sonaar Podcaster WordPress ThemeCorporate Welfare vs. Taxpayer Relief: The Case of the La Crosse Airport “Grant”
Corporate Welfare vs. Taxpayer Relief: The Case of the La Crosse Airport “Grant”

Corporate Welfare vs. Taxpayer Relief: The Case of the La Crosse Airport “Grant”

Update: 2025-01-18
Share

Description

As I see it, I’m Andy Parrish. The La Crosse County Board has been asked to approve a $250,000
“grant” for the La Crosse Airport. Why? The funds would go towards a $1.5 million, what they call a “minimum revenue guarantee program”, which I call corporate welfare, aimed at bringing Delta
Airlines back to the region. Now, to be fair, I applaud the board for listening to their constituents. And thankfully, the board has not yet made a decision on this request. But let me be clear. There is no justification for taking money from hardworking individuals and local businesses to guarantee revenue for a private company. Corporate welfare should never take precedence over offering relief to taxpayers who are already burdened by sky-high taxes. If the board can find $250,000 to guarantee Delta’s revenue,
they should have already cut your taxes by the same. For WIZM, I’m Andy Parrish.

Comments 
loading
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Corporate Welfare vs. Taxpayer Relief: The Case of the La Crosse Airport “Grant”

Corporate Welfare vs. Taxpayer Relief: The Case of the La Crosse Airport “Grant”

Andy Parrish