
This episode of CS is provocatively titled “
The Lapsed Dance.”In the 4
th episode titled “
Martyrs”, we examined the persecution Christians faced at the hands of the Roman authorities. We noted that persecution, while at times fierce, wasn’t one, long campaign of terror that lasted for a couple centuries. It tended to be
spasmodic &
regional, based on the whim of the current emperor, enforced in spotty fashion by governors who either agreed or disagreed with the official policy from far-away Rome. There were a couple seasons of Empire-wide persecution in the 3
rd C that proved to be the most intense.Following
Trajan’s more even-handed attempt to deal with the problem of the Christians in the early 2
nd C, 2 Emperors followed a more rigorous campaign of persecution & pressed its application to the borders of the Empire. In the mid to late 3
rd C,
Decius & Diocletian considered Christianity a dangerous threat. Their reasons for opposing the Faith were several but looming large was the concern Christianity would
weaken the Army, desperately needed to protect the borders being harassed by barbarians. Also, die-hard pagans claimed the old gods who’d overseen Rome’s
rise to greatness were
angry so many of their worshippers had turned to the new Faith. They warned disaster loomed; the only way to stay it was to
appease the wrath of the gods by slaking it with Christian blood.To this end, some Emperors renewed an old practice:
Emperor worship. While the details of this practice varied from time to time & place to place, the basic routine went like this . . .Once every so many years, the residents of a city had to appear in the public square, where they ascended a raised platform, picked up a pinch of incense, dropped it on some hot coals and announced, “Caesar is Lord.” The exact words of the oath varied depending on who was sitting on the throne. But the point was to honor the reigning Roman Emperor as a deity, minor as that deity might be in the pagan pantheon. While pagans who
already recognized a plethora of gods had no problem adding one more to the list, Christians owned a fierce repulsion to confessing anyone other than Jesus Christ
as Lord. They simply
couldn’t do it. As the pagan left the dais after going through this little rite, he was handed a
libelli – a certificate proving his loyalty. He kept that certificate as proof of loyalty, producing it whenever an authority asked him to show his compliance with Rome’s decree. In this manner, the Christians were marked out; they
had no libelli.Now, as can be imagined, this challenge led to some memorable martyrdoms, especially in North Africa where Christianity flourished. It also led to one of the biggest controversies the Church had yet faced.Some Christians, under the threat of death,
capitulated to the pressure, burned the incense & spoke fealty to Caesar. They took the libelli and went about their business. Once the Emperor Decius was gone and persecution eased, these capitulators repented their weakness and applied for readmission to the Church. The challenge for church leaders was = What was to be done with these “
lapsed” members, as they were called?Some advocated their
re-admission to the felloowship pending a review of their specific case by the local elders. Others, led by a church leader named
Novatian, argued vehemently for their
exclusion. For Novatian and his supporters, there was no room for any kind of negotiation. The lapsed were to be barred from fellowship. The controversy between the Novatianists and the majority of churches which by that time had made the church at Rome their unofficial headquarters became so great, it seemed there was only one way to solve it. The
Novatianists were declared heretical by the majority and put outside the Communion of Saints.The Novatianist controversy flared up again following the last great persecution under the Emperor Diocletian. This time it went by the name of
Donatism.During the Diocletian persecution, in order to avoid becoming martyrs, some
Church leaders had not only submitted to Caesar worship, they’d surrendered sacred texts to imperial authorities, and, shamefully ratted out other believers. Such lapsed leaders were called “
traditores” meaning,
those who surrender. One of these traditores was
Caecilian, also known as
Cyprian. Cyprian hadn’t capitulated and worshipped Caesar, but he
did go into hiding when the edict reached Carthage where he was bishop. His critics said he was
no better than those who lapsed by this desertion of his post. When the persecution lifted, he wanted to returned to his position. The Church at Carthage was the lead church of all North Africa, a region with a large population of Christians. The Novatianist-leanings of the previous generation were most strong there and were renewed at this time, sparked by the re-installation of Cyprian. Those who refused to accept him, selected their own leader in an elder named
Majorinus, whom they made a
rival bishop to Cyprian. Majorinus died shortly after being consecrated. He was replaced by
Donatus Magnus who advocated the same path of
rejecting traditores from church leadership.The Donatist Controversy is important because what was at stake was the Christian concept of forgiveness and reconciliation. Was the act of saying “Caesar is Lord” while burning incense to an image of the Emperor an act of idolatry that marked one as
apostate? And was such a coerced act something from which there was no repentance?Some said the betrayal by lapsed believers was a renouncing of Christ that condemned them to hell. Others said while some believers became martyrs and their faith was exemplary, those who gave in to the threat of death could not be held responsible and could be re-admitted to the fold,
if they showed proper repentance. But such returned believers could not serve in any capacity of leadership in the church. Some held a view of reconciliation so far-reaching, they said even pastors who lapsed could be restored to their positions.What emerged during this debate was the
importance of baptism.In the Books of Acts, baptism appears to have been used by the Apostles as the means by which believers identified their faith in Christ and their participation in the Community of Faith. On the Day of Pentecost, Peter called for new converts to be baptized
immediately. Philip led the Ethiopian eunuch in
immediate baptism. Baptism at the moment of conversion seems to be the NT pattern & the practice of the Apostolic Church.But at some point, church leaders began
delaying baptism, calling for converts to have a time of
learning before being officially welcomed into the church. The reason for this delay is uncertain, but may have come as a result of seeing that some
supposed converts
didn’t follow through on their commitment. They fell away after a short time. By
delaying baptism and preceding it with a period of instruction, it gave the convert a time to
prove the genuineness of their conversion.While conversion was a work of the Spirit in the human heart, baptism was seen as the way someone made a
public profession of faith and ushered them into the Community of Christ. So baptism became a kind of
definitive line in the sand. It was thought that if someone renounced Christ AFTER being baptized, they were an
apostate to whom repentance was now impossible.And as might be suspected, different regions understood all this this
differently. Some held that to go apostate meant that person had
forfeited salvation and was destined for hell. Other’s held that a seeming-apostate
was able to repent & return to grace, but their renouncing of the Lord meant their being forever excluded from fellowship. So, they could be saved, but were barred from attending church & taking Communion.Another position said if someone
did repent of what had earlier
appeared to be a renouncing of Christ, it was evidence they hadn’t
really gone apostate because if they had they
wouldn’t repent. Therefore, repentance and the demonstration of a
desire to return to God’s grace were evidence of salvation and for that reason the repentant ought to be
readmitted to fellowship.So à the
timing of baptism became a major issue on